Frankly, too many people confuse morality or legality of something. Drugs for recreational purposes, whether benign or she is a bad habit and is addictive. This does not necessarily mean that we should prohibit the the contrary. The prohibition of alcohol in the United States in the last century has demonstrated the limits of the penal framework to improve social behavior. There are simply things that human beings always have and always will. I firmly believe, like Nietzsche, that the most dangerous individuals are those who sincerely believe we need to improve human nature to make us good ... In reality we can not work on our living conditions and foster the emergence of a kind with a trial safer but rather acquired through individual experience, not taught by an ideology, an act of faith. .. or a law.
For, hear us, if we want to destroy something that is sometimes a mistake to cling negatively (ex-smoker I understand). It would be wiser to regulate behavior, to make Benin, even ridiculous, in fact Discart as an evil that it would be necessary to tolerate in its environment. Then people would abandon themselves, because they would then be forced to doubt themselves, their motivations, nobody forced them.
I think a lot of information. It is with great knowledge and experience we acquire reasonably-or-not a little wisdom. The illegality of drugs makes it difficult to know, understand, manage, contain. In declaring the criminal is also criminalizes the same momentum, forcing a trade in illegal and unfair profit, enriching social networks far more harmful to the common good than the occasional small O blissful in this world.
By prohibiting, we refuse to trust the ruling families in the values they are trying to instill in their children, and their ability to enforce the discipline of a healthy life and pro-active. They refuse to acknowledge the existence of behavior as something that is part of human life and learning. Because we hear again, only talking about nothing unusual nor fatal or very dangerous in the immediate ... We are talking about a behavior that in some individuals in a measurable percentage, becomes an abuse, so-called addiction, and to be treated, not condemned. And the percentage of success depends mostly on the recognition of the problem (which of course will be easier if we can speak openly). And if children are not forced to hide to find, will not it easier to deny them something that an adult should try warned?
There has always been and will always be drugs, prostitution, deviance in society, and oh how many more monsters yet. It is more efficient and smarter to treat them as diseases than to attempt ablation as if it were a supernatural invasion against the will of God.
The ignorant want to burn witches. It is perhaps time that we understand that magic does not exist, that normality, morality, it is discussed, it evolves, and people not normal, it's always better to present a psychiatrist than sending them to prison.
For, hear us, if we want to destroy something that is sometimes a mistake to cling negatively (ex-smoker I understand). It would be wiser to regulate behavior, to make Benin, even ridiculous, in fact Discart as an evil that it would be necessary to tolerate in its environment. Then people would abandon themselves, because they would then be forced to doubt themselves, their motivations, nobody forced them.
I think a lot of information. It is with great knowledge and experience we acquire reasonably-or-not a little wisdom. The illegality of drugs makes it difficult to know, understand, manage, contain. In declaring the criminal is also criminalizes the same momentum, forcing a trade in illegal and unfair profit, enriching social networks far more harmful to the common good than the occasional small O blissful in this world.
By prohibiting, we refuse to trust the ruling families in the values they are trying to instill in their children, and their ability to enforce the discipline of a healthy life and pro-active. They refuse to acknowledge the existence of behavior as something that is part of human life and learning. Because we hear again, only talking about nothing unusual nor fatal or very dangerous in the immediate ... We are talking about a behavior that in some individuals in a measurable percentage, becomes an abuse, so-called addiction, and to be treated, not condemned. And the percentage of success depends mostly on the recognition of the problem (which of course will be easier if we can speak openly). And if children are not forced to hide to find, will not it easier to deny them something that an adult should try warned?
There has always been and will always be drugs, prostitution, deviance in society, and oh how many more monsters yet. It is more efficient and smarter to treat them as diseases than to attempt ablation as if it were a supernatural invasion against the will of God.
The ignorant want to burn witches. It is perhaps time that we understand that magic does not exist, that normality, morality, it is discussed, it evolves, and people not normal, it's always better to present a psychiatrist than sending them to prison.
